Saturday, February 09, 2008

Pedal to the Metal: What happens when signals change


上星期有一則新聞:


在紅綠燈上加裝倒數計時器日漸普及,但交通部運輸研究所的報告指出,加裝綠燈倒數器的路口肇事件數比設置前多一倍,加裝紅燈倒數器則減少一半,兩者兼有的路口肇事件數增加一九%。運研所建議,儘速拆除綠燈倒數計時器,或關閉功能。


這個跟 prospect theory 下的 loss aversion 有沒有關係? 我個人覺得有。


我猜想(也希望)若期望理論的基礎能更穩固,他能解釋更多元的人類行為,也能帶給個經一些新的刺激。

Tuesday, February 05, 2008

老虎伍茲 vs. 其他選手: 其他選手會變弱?


答案是:會!

簡單來講,老虎伍茲太強了!所以搞的其他選手都沒有誘因好好打。

What Every Economics Lecture Should be Like

Steven Levitt 寫說他有一次請了一位特別來賓到他的課堂上:

I brought in a very high-priced call girl to guest lecture at my undergraduate
Economics of Crime class.


那堂課的評價呢?:

The next day, I asked my students whether they liked the lecture. More than one-third of them said it was the single best lecture they had attended in their
four years of college. I had to agree with them.


話說那一堂課有一些有趣的對話:

One of his research subjects is a former computer programmer who charges $300 an hour as a high-end call girl. Levitt asked her if she was happy when her “client line” rang on her Palm Pilot. She told him that she wasn’t happy, but indifferent. He told her that meant she was not charging enough for her services. Later,Levitt offered to pay her the hourly rate she charged clients if she would come speak to his economics class. He was surprised, however,when one of the students asked the prostitute what she charged and she replied, “$400 an hour.” The student then asked her how she had determined that rate. “She turned to me,” Levitt recalled, “flashed me this huge smile and said, ‘Well, I was talking with Professor Levitt and he convinced me that my services were worth more than I was previously charging.

Thursday, January 31, 2008

研究生的態度

我今天看到的一句話:

By grad school, students know the drill cold: read assignments, hear lectures, do homework, and spit it all back on the exam. Problem is, just then the game changes from grades to papers; few will care about your grades, compared to your research papers, written and published. A research paper is not a term paper, and can't be dashed off the weekend before it is due. A research paper does not offer a broad overview; it says something specific and new, even if minor, that fits in a context of other research papers.

看到這一句很感動! 因為上一學期的實變把我搞瘋了,不但被當 (人生第一次被當) 也影響到我其他科目的表現,因為花太多時間在那上面導致我很多經濟的課都是臨時抱佛腳。

結論: 用心在研究上是研究生的職責!

Good Economics vs. Bad Economics

我想最近大家可能都忙著想一些新鮮的題目,試圖尋找自己的經濟見解。但是,若你像我,時常胡思亂想,將一堆學過的東西串在一起,最後發現整個邏輯很勉強,甚至到最後連自己都無法說服時,你可能就是一開始就是錯的。所以有沒有什麼方法可以一開始就檢視自己的理論是不是對的呢?

我最近在讀一本書,名叫 "Discover Your Inner Economist - Use Incentives to Fall in Love, Survive Your Next Meeting, and Motivate Your Dentist." 這一本書是 Tyler Cowen 所寫的,所以喜歡閱讀他的部落格的人會覺得他所引用的例子或故事相當熟。他在第一章有提到說要如何辨認 Good Economics 或 Bad Economics 的方法,我認為這方法非常適合大家,例如學生或做研究的人,在此跟大家分享:

1. The Postcard Test: 你的理論的概要必須在一張小卡片上就能闡述清楚了。
2. The Grandma Test: 你的奶奶必須能夠聽懂你的理論。
3. The Aha Test: 你的奶奶聽完你的理論後必須要有一點驚喜感,最後要點點頭說: "有道理!"

若你的理論無法做到這三點,你的理論就可能太複雜,也很可能就是錯的。

Sunday, December 09, 2007

Jp-Tw Contract Theory Conference

我昨天 (12/8) 跑去中研院參加 Contract Theory 的研討會。這個研討會說起來挺有趣的,因為日本自己每一個都定期來一個Contract Theory Workshop。(Relevant Information: here and here。) 但是這一次來台灣跟咱們聚一聚,一起腦力激盪。

昨天學到相當多的東西,大部分在於如何問問題。昨天許多問題與建議我覺得都非常好。我也覺得我應該加強這一點,參加了那麼多研討會,總覺得自己得直覺反應不夠快,但是有再進步,畢竟我也發現許多提出來的問題,也是我心中的疑問。

但是重頭戲在晚上! 我帶著我朋友,邱哲良,一起跟他們吃飯。一到餐館發現,有四張桌仔,而有人問起: "哪一張是主桌?" 我就看到服務小姐,指著窗旁角落的桌子。而我也看到周嗣文,蔡崇聖,周瑞賢,我們清大的老師都坐在那裡,我也有一股衝動想坐在那裡,但是聽說是主桌就自己找了一桌坐。沒有想到,盡然有兩個日本人跑來跟我們坐,所以我就展現我的熱情開始跟做我左邊的日本人聊天。我問他叫什麼名子,他就把他的名牌秀出來給我看,我一看到我就知道我做錯桌子了,上面寫著 Hiroshi Osano,是這一次的 oraganizer 之一,正當我心中開始有一股涼意時,我看到陳恭平老師也跑來,坐在Osano的旁邊,那時是我這冬季以來第一次感到寒冷。但是,沒有關係,因為其他坐在那一桌的台灣同胞,都以為我們是日本人,所以陳恭平老師還用英文到酒給我喝,我也喝了,身子也暖起來了。最後發現我會中文,才知道我只是一個台灣的小毛頭。

整個晚餐氣份很好,那一些日本人很好聊,他們對台灣的吃的很有興趣,而我也對日本的文化有一點興趣,昨天聊了很多有關皇室的事情,因為作在邱哲良旁的Shinsuke Kambe在皇室成立的大學教書。他們也對我的手機感到興趣,他們覺得太小了! 很好玩!

後來我的老師又帶大家去喝酒,我也就跟著去了,最後喝的醉醺醺的,不知東南西北,只好跟著邱哲良到他的家去過夜。以後不能喝太多酒!

Monday, October 15, 2007

Nobel Prize in Economics 2007

Goes to Leo Hurwicz, Eric Maskin, and Roger Myerson, "for having laid the foundations of mechanism design theory."

這是我 之前 (現在??) 很有興趣的領域,機制設計。這領域數學能力要有一定的基礎,頭腦要非常清楚。

我今年初有去聽 Eric Maskin 在台大舉辦兩天的講習,教導大家基本的機制設計的觀念。他給我應向非常深刻,他用淺顯易懂的例子就將我在論文上看不懂的東西給解釋清楚了! 超強!

所以說,我也是有被諾貝爾獎得主教過的人。

More on this later this week.

Thursday, October 11, 2007

Economics Nobel Predictor 2007: Part 2

The odds at Ladbrokes.

Helpman and Grossman 仍然是 favorites! 但是 Bhagwati 的名子竟然沒有在上面。

悲亢的詩 (北島)

〈回答〉──北島

卑鄙是卑鄙者的通行證,
高尚是高尚者的墓誌銘。
看吧,在那鍍金的天空中,
飄滿了死者彎曲的倒影。
冰川紀過去了,
為什麼到處都是冰淩?
好望角發現了,
為什麼死海裏千帆相競?
我來到這個世界上,
只帶著紙、繩索和身影,
為了在審判之前,宣讀那些被判決的聲音:
告訴你吧,世界
我-不-相-信!
縱使你腳下有一千名挑戰者,
那就把我算作第一千零一名。
我不相信天是藍的;
我不相信雷的回聲;
我不相信夢是假的;
我不相信死無報應。
如果海洋註定要決堤,
就讓所有的苦水都注入我心中;
如果陸地註定要上升,
就讓人類重新選擇生存的峰頂。
新的轉機和閃閃星斗,
正在綴滿沒有遮攔的天空,
那是五千年的象形文字,
那是未來人們凝視的眼睛。

Sunday, September 30, 2007

The Conflict between an Economist and an Economic Man

我長期以來都覺得經濟學裡的模型將人假設的太"聰明"。但是,經濟學家又認為當這一些人表現的不"聰明"的話就表示他不"理性"。所以理性到底是什麼? 而經濟學家又真得很理性嗎? 下面的故事是 Harry Markowitz (1990年諾貝爾獎得主,CAPM的始祖) 在做投資時的趣事:



"There is a story in the book about Harry Markowitz,” Mr. Zweig said the other day. He was referring to Harry M. Markowitz, the renowned economist who shared a Nobel for helping found modern portfolio theory — and proving the importance of diversification. It’s a story that says everything about how most of us act when it comes to investing. Mr. Markowitz was then working at the RAND Corporation and trying to figure out how to allocate his retirement account. He knew what he should do: “I should have computed the historical co-variances of the asset classes and drawn an efficient frontier.” (That’s efficient-market talk for draining as much risk as possible out of his portfolio.)

But, he said, “I visualized my grief if the stock market went way up and I wasn’t in it — or if it went way down and I was completely in it. So I split my contributions 50/50 between stocks and bonds.” As Mr. Zweig notes dryly, Mr. Markowitz had proved “incapable of applying” his breakthrough theory to his own money. Economists in his day believed powerfully in the concept of “economic man”— the theory that people always acted in their own best self-interest. Yet Mr. Markowitz, famous economist though he was, was clearly not an example of economic man.

所以若這麼天才的經濟學家都無法依照他自己所創的模型做投資決定,我們憑什麼認為現在的經濟學沒有什麼 "重大" 的問題。我個人認為經濟學有很嚴重的問題,需要更新的方法解決。實驗 anyone?

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Economics Nobel Predictor 2007: Part 1

九月快結束了! 而十月中,就要公布諾貝爾經濟學獎的得主。有哪一些人有機會得呢?


Thomson Scientific 預測今年這幾位經濟學家有機會:

Elhanan Helpman Galen L. Stone Professor of International Trade Harvard University Cambridge, Mass., USA Emeritus Professor Department of
Economics Tel Aviv University, Israel
-and-
Gene M. Grossman Jacob Viner Professor of International Economics Princeton University Princeton, N.J., USA Professor, Department of Economics Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs Princeton, N.J., USA
For their contributions to international trade and economic growth.

Robert B. Wilson Adams Distinguished Professor of Management Emeritus Stanford Graduate School of Business Stanford University Stanford, Calif., USA
-and-
Paul R. Milgrom Shirley and Leonard Ely Professor of Humanities, Department of Economics Stanford University Stanford, Calif., USA
For their work, both theoretical and practical, on the mechanism of auctions.

Jean Tirole Scientific Director, Institute of Industrial Economics University of Social Sciences Toulouse, France Affiliated research member of CERAS Paris, France For his research in industrial organization and regulation.

我認為這幾位經濟學家都應得獎,但是應該不是今年得。例如,Jean Tirole 在 industrial organization 跟 contract theory 上有卓越的貢獻,但是論得獎還早了一點。而 Milgrom 與 Wilson 若要拿獎,很難不包含 Krebs 跟 Roberts,號稱 "The gang of four." Helpman 也一樣,講到 international trade,很難想像 Bhagwati 還沒有拿到,所以 Helpman 可能還太早 (不然就是一起得)。


從今天起我每幾天,都會介紹一位我認為有機會得獎的經濟學家。

Monday, September 24, 2007

排隊理論: Part 1 of 2

為何大家要排隊?

排隊是一件非常沒有效率的事情,就拿飲水機來說: 排隊是按照每一個人到來的順序,而不是每一個人的口渴程度排序。因此當一位散步到飲水機喝水的人排在剛跑完4000m的人的前面時,這種結果就很沒有效率。於是就有經濟學家想一個解決這件事的方式,而這個答案非常直接也很簡單,賣位置。

那一位散步而來的人可以將他的位置賣給剛剛跑完的人。其實,這種行為很常見,我們都稱這些人 "黃牛" (我之前有賣過黃牛票,不好賺!)。但是為何不是所有的排隊都可以用此方式解決呢? 有幾個可能的原因:

1. 買票跟排隊喝水只差在,買票可以依次買很多票,而喝水只能一次一個人喝。所以那一位散步的人只能賣給一個口渴的跑者,而那一位賣黃牛的人可以賣給許多個買家。但是占一次位置的fixed cost 很高,只賣給一個人是無法cover的。

2. 若將位置賣給口渴的人,其他位置的人可能會提出更低的價格,最後結果就像 Bertrand competition 一樣。其實我強烈質疑販賣黃牛票的非法性,因為按照一般的分析結果會發現,若販賣黃牛票合法化,會有許多賣家加入,將利潤降到0,因此買黃牛票的人只是沒有時間排隊而已,也不會因此而負更多錢,而原賣家(例如主辦單位)也不會怕黃牛將票價提高。所以禁止販賣黃牛票似乎是道德問題,而非經濟問題。

現在目前的方式雖然很沒有效率但是,大家所提出的解決辦法也都難以實行。我最近閱讀到一個非常特別的解決方式,下一次跟各位分享。

Sunday, September 23, 2007

有人看我的部落閣

一位大陸網友 (我不認識),有看過我的部落閣。

我怎麼知道? 在他的部落格裡,最右邊有一欄為 "形形色色"。請問第一個 link 是什麼?

Saturday, September 22, 2007

左右腦


請問上面這個女的旋轉方向為何? (要點一下圖片)
若你看到的為順時鐘,則你的右腦比左腦發達。
若你看到的為逆時鐘,則你的左腦比右腦發達。
若你依開始看到的是逆時鐘,而後突然變為順時鐘,則你的IQ有可能超過160!!
很有趣吧!

Thursday, September 20, 2007

The Essential Math


這些是想當經濟學家的必修數學課程 suggested by Greg Mankiw:


Calculus
Linear Algebra
Multivariable Calculus
Real Analysis
Probability Theory
Mathematical Statistics
Game Theory
Differential Equations


我只差 probability theory, and differential equations. 現在正在修real analysis. 這也是為何我最近都沒有寫文章. 因為每星期都有作業!!

Saturday, September 08, 2007

More Sex $969

我前幾天去書店買書,書名叫 More Sex Is Safer Sex: The Unconventional Wisdom of Economics. 標題非常聳動!

結帳時,條碼一刷,螢幕卻顯示: MORE SEX $969。That is pretty cheap!

Thursday, September 06, 2007

Profile of Robert Barro

The Profile. Still reading it, but this sentence struck me:

It would have been difficult to predict this outcome [of his success in economics] from the title of Barro's first publication in 1970: "The Crystal Structure of a Dimeric Cobalt Compound Containing a Chloro Bridge."


為何Barro沒有繼續研究物理呢?

"Feynman was a great inspiration, but what he taught was often way above my head. It made me realize I wouldn't be close to the top in those fields."

我國中時也非常迷物理,也是被Feynman的書吸引住了。當時我看了他的自傳 Surely You're Joking Mr. Feynman, 至近對我的影響仍然很大,因為是那ㄧ本書讓我對學者的印像改觀。後來在師大附中唸高中時,才發現物理=霧裡。我雖然成績在班上不錯,但是我知道若我繼續追隨當物理學家的夢,我對人類知識的貢獻是非常有限的。我的目標一直是想要有一點貢獻。

A Great Loss: Luciano Pavarotti passes away at the age of 71

The News.

這位歌劇巨星因為胰臟癌去逝。我的阿姨十年前也因為胰臟癌去逝。有醫生說過,胰臟癌末期的病患很難活超過八個月。

我記得我第一次聽到Pavarotti唱歌是我幼稚園的時候。我當時還住在紐約,而紐約的公共電視非常喜歡播放 "三大男高音" 的表演。我記得我被他們的聲音深深的感動,甚至在洗澡間,邊洗邊模仿。

這非常有趣:

.....what appears to have been a normal childhood with a typical interest in sports — in Pavarotti's case soccer above all — he graduated from the Schola Magistrale and faced the dilemma of a career choice. He was interested in pursuing a career as a professional soccer player, but his mother convinced him to train as a teacher. He subsequently taught in an elementary school for two years but finally allowed his interest in music to win out.

During his years of study Pavarotti held part-time jobs in order to help sustain himself — first as an elementary school teacher and then, when he failed at that, as an insurance salesman.
我們應該很慶幸,他選擇了音樂這條路!


Wednesday, September 05, 2007

Fun Facts About CEO and Firm Value

From recent studies:

[Firm's Value] slid by about one-fifth, on average, in the two years after the death of a CEO's child, and by about 15% after the death of a spouse. As for an executive's mother-in-law, the old jokes seem to hold: The researchers found that profitability, on average, rose slightly after her demise.

非常有趣!

Sunday, September 02, 2007

Prediction Tools

非常好玩! 我發現平均而言我可以活到82歲

還有其餘的一些網站都在這網頁